<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Frances de Pontes Peebles answered my question about her book	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/</link>
	<description>Books live here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: readerwitch		</title>
		<link>/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1544</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[readerwitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=276#comment-1544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1543&quot;&gt;nsfordwriter&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m sending best wishes for the both of your books! :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1543">nsfordwriter</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sending best wishes for the both of your books! 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nsfordwriter		</title>
		<link>/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nsfordwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=276#comment-1543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1542&quot;&gt;readerwitch&lt;/a&gt;.

No I don&#039;t re-read it - I sent it to agents etc but it&#039;s the kind of novel I&#039;d prob self publish when I have the time. Maybe re-work it one day. I&#039;m proud of having finished it (and about 3 whole edits) but then I wanted to move on, because I had new ideas! Which is why I&#039;m writing another one. I think it has more commercial appeal and more chance of getting attention. Thanks for taking an interest :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1542">readerwitch</a>.</p>
<p>No I don&#8217;t re-read it &#8211; I sent it to agents etc but it&#8217;s the kind of novel I&#8217;d prob self publish when I have the time. Maybe re-work it one day. I&#8217;m proud of having finished it (and about 3 whole edits) but then I wanted to move on, because I had new ideas! Which is why I&#8217;m writing another one. I think it has more commercial appeal and more chance of getting attention. Thanks for taking an interest 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: readerwitch		</title>
		<link>/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1542</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[readerwitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 21:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=276#comment-1542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1541&quot;&gt;nsfordwriter&lt;/a&gt;.

Those that were written quickly can also be good but they still have a different feeling about them. I haven&#039;t read this one of Bronte. I totally agree with you about people of certain class having more time to write books. I heard that that&#039;s why Tolstoy wrote. He wrote not because he was an author but because the nobility was expected to create art, books, music. That&#039;s what they were doing all day. Some definitely were more talented than others :)) Anyway, the main thing I want to talk about is your novel. WOW! Congratulations on that! That&#039;s a huge thing to have a whole novel finished! Do you reread it? :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1541">nsfordwriter</a>.</p>
<p>Those that were written quickly can also be good but they still have a different feeling about them. I haven&#8217;t read this one of Bronte. I totally agree with you about people of certain class having more time to write books. I heard that that&#8217;s why Tolstoy wrote. He wrote not because he was an author but because the nobility was expected to create art, books, music. That&#8217;s what they were doing all day. Some definitely were more talented than others :)) Anyway, the main thing I want to talk about is your novel. WOW! Congratulations on that! That&#8217;s a huge thing to have a whole novel finished! Do you reread it? 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nsfordwriter		</title>
		<link>/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nsfordwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 20:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=276#comment-1541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1540&quot;&gt;readerwitch&lt;/a&gt;.

I have only spent about 4 months on mine. I did write a novel last year, which took about 8 months. I&#039;m very serious about my current one so I&#039;ll work on it until I&#039;m happy with it. Oddly, some books were apparently written really quickly because the author was so inspired, while others take a long time to perfect. Depends how much time they have available. I have so little time to get into the swing of writing now that it could well take me several years! I liked some of Atwood&#039;s earlier books too. One of the most well written and structured books I can think of is Villette by Charlotte Bronte. No idea how long it took her to write, but there wasn&#039;t a lot else to do on those days...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1540">readerwitch</a>.</p>
<p>I have only spent about 4 months on mine. I did write a novel last year, which took about 8 months. I&#8217;m very serious about my current one so I&#8217;ll work on it until I&#8217;m happy with it. Oddly, some books were apparently written really quickly because the author was so inspired, while others take a long time to perfect. Depends how much time they have available. I have so little time to get into the swing of writing now that it could well take me several years! I liked some of Atwood&#8217;s earlier books too. One of the most well written and structured books I can think of is Villette by Charlotte Bronte. No idea how long it took her to write, but there wasn&#8217;t a lot else to do on those days&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: readerwitch		</title>
		<link>/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1540</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[readerwitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=276#comment-1540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1539&quot;&gt;nsfordwriter&lt;/a&gt;.

How long have you spent on yours? Sometimes I think that&#039;s why classics always sound different. They didn&#039;t hurry anywhere. The book grows while they are shaping and reshaping it with years. I think some perfect form can be only achieved after you tried millions of others, but also after you thought about it for a long time and found something there you wouldn&#039;t have noticed otherwise. The only other time I felt I was reading something that seamless was with Margaret Atwood (her earlier works not the ones publicized now). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1539">nsfordwriter</a>.</p>
<p>How long have you spent on yours? Sometimes I think that&#8217;s why classics always sound different. They didn&#8217;t hurry anywhere. The book grows while they are shaping and reshaping it with years. I think some perfect form can be only achieved after you tried millions of others, but also after you thought about it for a long time and found something there you wouldn&#8217;t have noticed otherwise. The only other time I felt I was reading something that seamless was with Margaret Atwood (her earlier works not the ones publicized now). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nsfordwriter		</title>
		<link>/2018/09/04/frances-de-pontes-peebles/#comment-1539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nsfordwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 20:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=276#comment-1539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow 9 years to write the book... I don&#039;t think I&#039;d have the patience to spend that long on one book, but it seems to have paid off for Frances!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow 9 years to write the book&#8230; I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d have the patience to spend that long on one book, but it seems to have paid off for Frances!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
